Patient Outcomes

FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA (March 11, 2024) - As use of prosthetic heart valves and implanted cardiac devices has increased, so too has the incidence of cardiovascular infection. While accurate diagnosis of this condition is critical for guiding treatment decisions that can prevent death and significant morbidity, current assessment strategies have proven insufficient. Recommendations released by 11 professional medical societies, including the Society of Thoracic Surgeons, detail a standardized approach for using PET/CT and SPECT/CT imaging to improve the evaluation and subsequent outcomes of patients with cardiovascular infection. The expert consensus statement – “18F-FDG PET/CT and Radiolabeled Leukocyte SPECT/CT Imaging for the Evaluation of Cardiovascular Infection in the Multimodality Context” – is published online in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, Clinical Infectious Disease, Heart Rhythm Journal, and JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging.

“The stakes are high with cardiovascular infection because the incidence is increasing and there is associated high morbidity and mortality,” says Jamieson M. Bourque, MD, MHS, FASNC, chair of the statement’s multisociety writing committee. “Other guidelines have recognized that FDG PET/CT and SPECT/CT imaging have high diagnostic accuracy with cardiovascular infection and can provide important information on the infection site, severity, cause, and whether the infection has spread outside the heart. This document does what others have not – it provides evidence-based consensus on specific clinical scenarios where FDG PET/CT and SPECT/CT add value for patient care in the context of robust multimodality imaging approaches available.”

Reflecting its multidisciplinary authorship, the statement emphasizes the complementary nature of advanced imaging modalities. It outlines the indications for echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography angiography, radiolabeled leukocyte SPECT/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in cardiovascular infection evaluation. The authors then provide a consensus-derived clinical indication rating of "appropriate," "may be appropriate," or "rarely appropriate" for use of 18F-FDG PET/CT and SPECT/CT in 73 clinical scenarios encompassing suspected native and prosthetic valve infective endocarditis, suspected cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infections, suspected prosthetic material infection, and suspected ventricular assist device (VAD) infection.

The expert consensus recommendations statement also includes:

• Diagnostic algorithmic flowcharts for suspected native or prosthetic valve infective endocarditis or prosthetic material/VAD infection and for suspected CIED infection;
• Teaching images from cases where 18F-FDG PET/CT and SPECT/CT studies were used in  prosthetic valve endocarditis, CIED pocket and lead infection, VAD infection and prosthetic material infection; and
• Teaching case examples where 18F-FDG PET/CT and SPECT/CT were used to assess prosthetic valve endocarditis, suspected lead CIED infection, suspected VAD infection and suspected prosthetic material infection.

“18F-FDG PET/CT and Radiolabeled Leukocyte SPECT/CT Imaging for the Evaluation of Cardiovascular Infection in the Multimodality Context” is the first document in the new American Society of Nuclear Cardiology Imaging Indications (ASNC I2) Series. Eleven partnering organizations participated in writing these recommendations and endorsed the document: The American Society of Nuclear Cardiology (ASNC), the American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE), the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT), the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). The writing committee included representatives from each of the partnering organizations.

Read the consensus statement. 

# # #

ABOUT ASNC

The American Society of Nuclear Cardiology and its 5,200 members have been improving cardiovascular outcomes through image-guided patient management for more than 30 years. As the leading society dedicated solely to the field of nuclear cardiology, ASNC establishes standards for excellence in cardiovascular imaging through the development of clinical guidelines, professional medical education, advocacy and research development. ASNC provides peer-reviewed original articles through its official publication, The Journal of Nuclear Cardiology. For more information, visit http://www.asnc.org.

ABOUT STS

Founded in 1964, The Society of Thoracic Surgeons is a not-for-profit organization representing more than 7,700 cardiothoracic surgeons, researchers, and allied healthcare professionals worldwide who are dedicated to ensuring the best possible outcomes for surgeries of the heart, lung, and esophagus, as well as other surgical procedures within the chest. The Society’s mission is to enhance the ability of cardiothoracic surgeons to provide the highest quality patient care through education, research, and advocacy.

During this session, investigators unveiled findings from the largest multicenter study of post-arterial switch operations (ASO) that resulted in increased survival rates for adolescents and adult patients – as well as an increase in the potential for these patients to require cardiac reoperations to address arterial switch related complications that arise later in life.

At day two's presentation on “Burden of Reoperative  Cardiac Surgery among Adolescents and Adults Who Have Undergone Prior Arterial Switch Operation: Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database Analysis,” Bret Mettler, MD, from Johns Hopkins University, examined a multi-year assessment of the prevalence and types of cardiac surgical interventions in patients who previously underwent ASO using data from the STS National Database. 

“Anatomical repair of transposition of the great arteries (TGA) and related anomalies by arterial switch operation (ASO) achieves a normal anatomic and physiologic cardiac configuration,” said Dr. Mettler.  “And as survival rates have increased, so have the potential for these patients to require cardiac reoperations to address resulting ASO-related complications.”

As most reoperations involved multiple procedures, the presentation examined how a hierarchical stratification of procedure categories was established, with each eligible surgical hospitalization assigned to the single highest applicable hierarchical category.
  
Dr. Mettler's presentation also examined implications for surgical counseling, post-operative clinical surveillance, and therapeutic management. An analysis of the role of procedural prevalence, timing, categories, trends, and the growing number of reoperations was discussed.

Shortly after the 60th STS Annual Meeting began, a packed crowd attended the "Trends and Research from the STS Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (ACSD)" session, beginning with a presentation by Michael E. Bowdish, MD, of the Smid Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. He looked back at the origins of the ACSD, which was established in 1989 to collect information on cardiac surgery procedures, track outcomes, and provide insights into opportunities for quality improvement. 

Today – more than three decades later – the Database offers more than nine million recorded procedures making it one of the most comprehensive, robust, and sophisticated contemporary clinical databases in use.   

For example, 95% of centers performing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in the United States, and 97% of patients receiving CABG are included in the STS ACSD. Every year 10% of the participating sites undergo a data audit assessing data accuracy and completeness with strict thresholds to pass quality control. Continuous education of data managers is a further element to ensure data quality. 

"STS ACSD is a vital source of data for outcomes research quality improvement, with overall volumes that are stable with notable trends in aortic surgery," said Dr. Bowdish.

The STS ACSD has provided the foundation for national benchmarking in adult cardiac surgery through the development of regularly updated and recalibrated risk models and performance metrics, the availability of feedback reports to database participants and individual surgeons, quality-improvement efforts, voluntary public reporting, and comparative effectiveness research. 

Two STS 2024 sessions featured late-breaking research covering new findings on a research study focused on resectable early stage non-small-cell lung cancer and a study that used data to define characteristics associated with long-term survival following esophagectomy for cancer.

Impact of Surgical Factors on Event-Free Survival in the Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 KEYNOTE-671 Trial of Perioperative Pembrolizumab For Early Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

In a talk given by presenting author Jonathan David Spicer, MD, PhD, of McGill University, he discussed new findings from the KEYNOTE-671 research study, focused on resectable early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which have unveiled a significant breakthrough in the treatment landscape. 

The study, titled "Impact of Surgical-Related Data on Event-Free Survival in KEYNOTE-671," demonstrated that neoadjuvant therapy with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy did not delay surgery. "Results showed that neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy with adjuvant pembrolizumab provided meaningful improvement in EFS," said Dr. Spicer. "This was shown when compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone for resectable early stage NSCLC – regardless of clinical nodal status, baseline disease stage, or type of surgery."

Longitudinal Follow-up of Elderly Patients After Esophageal Cancer Resection in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database

In this study, Justin Blasberg, MD, of Yale School of Medicine, used the STS General Thoracic Surgery Database linked to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data to define characteristics associated with long-term survival following esophagectomy for cancer. The analysis included 4,798 patients from 207 STS sites who underwent esophagectomy between 2012-2019. "The researchers found that Medicare patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer exhibit identifiable predictors for long-term survival and readmission," noted Dr. Blasberg. "The absence of pathologic T and N downstaging increases the risk for long-term mortality and readmission."

These findings suggest opportunities to enhance clinical practice and improve outcomes for Medicare patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer. 

On day one of STS 2024, meeting goers attended numerous sessions that explored the growing debate between SAVR and TAVR as treatment options,

"Improved Longitudinal Outcomes with Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement with Atrial Fibrillation Management over Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Alone," part of the larger "Bring SAVR Back" session given by J Hunter Mehaffey, MD, unveiled Class I guideline recommendations that support atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment during surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). And how recently, many low to intermediate risk patients with AF and aortic stenosis (AS) are managed by transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). And finally, they evaluated real-world longitudinal outcomes of TAVR vs SAVR with or without AF treatment. 

"We concluded that in Medicare beneficiaries with AF who required aortic valve replacement, SAVR with concomitant treatment of AF was associated with improved longitudinal survival and freedom from stroke compared to TAVR," noted Dr. Mehaffey. "Consideration should be given for SAVR with AF treatment as a first-line approach for patients with AF requiring aortic valve replacement." 

In his discussion of "Robotic Aortic Valve Replacement versus Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Propensity Matched Analysis," Vikrant Jagadeesan, MD, presented findings on contemporary data that supports equipoise between surgical aortic valve replacement and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for the management of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS). He further explained that controversy exists around the optimal management of patients in low to intermediate risk categories, and how the study compared outcomes of surgical robotic aortic valve replacement (RAVR) to TAVR. 

"Compared to TAVR, RAVR was associated with lower stroke and PPM rates, less PVL, and improved 1 year survival," said Dr. Jagadeesan. "And RAVR may provide a safe and effective minimally invasive first-line alternative for low to intermediate risk patients presenting with symptomatic AS."

In a late breaking session titled, "Cardiac Surgery after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Trends and Outcomes," Michael Bowdish, MD, illustrated how his research team set out to document trends and outcomes in cardiac surgery following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), a topic gaining importance as reports of subsequent cardiac operations and early TAVR explantations increase. Using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database, the study covers adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery after an initial TAVR from January 2012 to March 2023. 

"The study findings underscore the escalating need for both aortic and non-aortic valve cardiac surgeries following TAVR," explained Dr. Bowdish. "They note a substantial increase in the frequency of these surgeries, emphasizing the importance of understanding outcomes."  He observed elevated risk in these cases, as indicated by mortality and stroke rates, which calls for careful consideration, particularly given the expanding use of TAVR across a broader range of age and risk profiles. Finally, the study suggests the need for ongoing assessment and longitudinal evidence to inform decision-making in the evolving landscape of TAVR applications. 

On Saturday, January 27 at 9:45 a.m. CT, Christopher Mehta, MD, from Northwestern Memorial Hospital in Chicago, will present “Age-Stratified Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis: An Analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (ACSD).” 

The study is part of the STS 2024 session titled, “Trends and Research from the STS ACSD.” During his talk, Dr. Mehta will provide insight into how comprehensive data help inform multidisciplinary heart teams in making decisions between surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for patients. 

Attendees will learn how the national landscape for SAVR and TAVR changed between 2011 and 2022, as experts evaluated age-specific trends and outcomes in surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients with bicuspid (BAV) or tricuspid (TAV) aortic valve by analyzing data from the STS ACSD. 

Throughout the 11-year study, which followed more than 200,000 adult patients with BAV or TAV who underwent AVR for moderate and severe aortic stenosis, age-specific trends and outcomes were evaluated. 

In observance of Lung Cancer Awareness Month, STS participated in a congressional press conference focused on the importance of lung cancer screening hosted on the U.S. Capitol grounds on Thursday, November 16. The event, hosted by Congresswoman Kathy Castor (D-FL), aimed to bring attention to the urgent need to get more people screened for lung cancer. 

Image

STS joined other key stakeholders in the lung cancer community at this event, including LUNGevity Foundation, American Lung Association, GO2 for Lung Cancer, Moffitt Cancer Center, the Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL).  

STS has a long history of advocating for robust patient access to lung cancer prevention, screenings, and treatment. “Over the past decade, significant progress has been made to expand insurance coverage of lung cancer screening, yet this press conference highlighted that significant challenges remain to increasing screening rates among at-risk individuals,” said Keith Mortman, MD, who participated in the press conference and is a member of the STS Workforce on Health Policy, Reform, and Advocacy. “While innovative treatments for lung cancer are rapidly emerging, not everyone has equal access to these cutting-edge treatments. STS is relentlessly advocating with policymakers in Washington to remove barriers and increase access so our members can offer the highest quality lung cancer care possible.”

To advance this priority, STS has advocated for H.R. 4286, Increasing Access to Lung Cancer Screening Act, a bipartisan bill introduced by Reps. Brian Higgins (D-NY), Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA), and Kathy Castor (D-FL), that would require all state Medicaid programs to cover lung cancer screenings for eligible enrollees as recommended by the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF). Urge your lawmakers to support this legislation today.

Overall survival rates of esophageal cancer have risen in the past 50-plus years, from 5% in 1970 to 22% in 2023. Yet, no comprehensive guidelines addressing multidisciplinary management of esophageal cancer that incorporate input from surgeons, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists have been available, until now. 

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Society for Radiation Oncology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology have co-authored the first comprehensive guideline on the management of esophageal cancer. Published today in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, the guideline addresses key clinical subject areas pertinent to the care of patients with locally advanced, resectable thoracic esophageal cancer. 

The guideline delivers recommendations for the use of induction chemotherapy, optimal radiation dose, value and timing of esophagectomy, use of chemotherapy vs. chemoradiotherapy before surgery, approach and extent of lymphadenectomy, and the value of adjuvant therapy after resection.

“These comprehensive guidelines address areas critical for standardizing and improving care and outcomes for esophageal cancer patients,” says study investigator Stephanie Worrell, MD, clinical associate professor and thoracic section chief at the University of Arizona in Tucson. “The recommendations are based on a comprehensive review of innovations and advancements in the most recent literature.”